Organizational Effectiveness in Online Teaching: China and Australia Compared

Authors

  • Jianyu Cheng University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/khsxjj14

Keywords:

online teaching, organizational effectiveness, McKinsey 7S, Input-Process-Output, China, Australia, comparative education

Abstract

This paper investigates the organizational effectiveness of online teaching in a Chinese public middle school during the COVID-19 pandemic, using Haileybury Pangea, an Australian private online school, as a comparative benchmark. Drawing on the McKinsey 7S framework and the Input-Process-Output (IPO) model, the study systematically examines multiple dimensions of organizational performance, including strategic orientation, operational systems, teacher professional development, student engagement, and institutional culture. The analysis reveals that the Chinese public school demonstrated remarkable resilience and adaptability in transitioning to online instruction; however, its efforts were constrained by fragmented digital platforms, insufficient teacher training, and a rigid hierarchical culture that limited pedagogical innovation. In contrast, Haileybury Pangea leveraged an integrated digital ecosystem, data-driven instructional design, and distributed leadership to cultivate a student-centred and sustainable online learning environment. The comparative findings underscore the critical importance of aligning vision-driven strategy with systemic infrastructure and fostering a culture of openness and experimentation. Based on these insights, the study offers actionable recommendations for enhancing China's public education system, including strengthening teacher autonomy, improving platform interoperability, promoting continuous professional development, and encouraging innovative teaching practices to sustain high-quality, resilient online learning.

References

1. J. Chen, "Enlightenments from High School Online English Class in China During Pandemic," In 2021 4th International Con-ference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2021), December, 2021, pp. 2640-2644. doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.211220.456.

2. B. F. Gonçalves, P. Vaz-Rebelo, M. T. R. Pessôa, and V. Gonçalves, “(Re) thinking Teacher Training in the Digital Age: Teacher Training Models for Online Practice,” in World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, Cham, Switzerland, Mar. 2024, pp. 110–119, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60224-5_12.

3. J. M. Halstead, and C. Zhu, "Autonomy as an element in Chinese educational reform: A case study of English lessons in a senior high school in Beijing," Asia Pacific Journal of Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 443-456, 2009. doi: 10.1080/02188790903308944.

4. S. Guo, T. Sun, J. Gong, Z. Lu, L. Zhang, and Q. Wang, “Remote co-teaching in rural classroom: Current practices, impacts, and challenges,” in Proc. CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Syst., Apr. 2022, pp. 1–16. doi: 10.1145/3491102.3501924.

5. R. H. Waterman Jr, T. J. Peters, and J. R. Phillips, "Structure is not organization," Business horizons, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 14-26, 1980, doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(80)90027-0.

6. B. Y. Suwanda and B. Nugroho, “Literature reviews: McKinsey 7S model to support organizational performance,” Technium Social Sciences Journal, vol. 38, p. 1, 2022. doi: 10.47577/tssj.v38i1.7744.

7. A. A. F. Alshaher, “The McKinsey 7S model framework for e-learning system readiness assessment,” Int. J. Adv. Eng. Tech-nol., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1948–1966, 2013.

8. D. F. Channon, and A. A. Caldart, "McKinsey 7S model," Wiley encyclopedia of management, pp. 1-1, 2015. doi: 10.1002/9781118785317.weom120005.

9. X. Wu, and R. Fitzgerald, "Reaching for the stars: DingTalk and the Multi-platform creativity of a 'one-star'campaign on Chinese social media," Discourse, Context & Media, vol. 44, p. 100540, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100540.

10. W. Li, and H. Wang, "Online teaching system combining information feedback and teaching evaluation," In 2021 11th Inter-national Conference on Information Technology in Medicine and Education (ITME), November, 2021, pp. 465-469. doi: 10.1109/itme53901.2021.00099.

11. D. Clarke, and H. Hollingsworth, "Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth," Teaching and teacher education, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 947-967, 2002. doi: 10.1016/s0742-051x(02)00053-7.

12. S. Hao, "Emotion Model of Teenagers in Online Learning," Frontiers in Educational Research, vol. 4, no. 11, 2021, doi: 10.25236/FER.2021.041108.

13. Z. Gan, "'Asian learners' re-examined: an empirical study of language learning attitudes, strategies and motivation among mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students," Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 41-58, 2009. doi: 10.1080/01434630802307890.

Downloads

Published

14 December 2025

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Organizational Effectiveness in Online Teaching: China and Australia Compared. (2025). Journal of Education, Humanities, and Social Research, 2(4), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.71222/khsxjj14