The Evolution of the European Union's Securitization of Climate Change and the Effectiveness of Its Policies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/eqbnz386Keywords:
climate change, securitization, European Union (EU), climate diplomacy, emissions reductionAbstract
As climate change intensifies as a pressing global concern, its securitization has become a pivotal issue in international governance. The European Union (EU), recognizing the escalating risks, has increasingly incorporated climate change into its security agenda, framing it as a non-traditional security threat. This paper explores the EU's securitization process through the framework of the Copenhagen School's Securitization Theory, examining its internal and external climate policies across discursive, institutional, and practical dimensions. Initially adopting a "rhetorical leadership" approach, the EU evolved towards "leadership-by-example" and, more recently, has assumed the role of a "leadiator", promoting global cooperation on climate initiatives. The paper evaluates the effectiveness of major EU policies, including emissions reduction commitments and the advancement of renewable energy, while also addressing persistent challenges such as internal policy fragmentation and external geopolitical pressures. The study concludes that although the EU's securitization of climate change has notably shaped global climate governance, significant obstacles remain in fostering deeper international collaboration and resolving internal inconsistencies.
References
1. S. Rutigliano, "The Decisive Link Between Sustainability and Security: Mandate, Scope and Purpose," in EU External Relations Law and Sustainability: The EU, Third States and International Organizations, The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2025, pp. 91-110, doi: 10.1007/978-94-6265-655-0_5.
2. C. Dupont, J. Rosamond, and B. L. Zaki, "Investigating the scientific knowledge–policy interface in EU climate policy," Policy Polit., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 88-107, 2024, doi: 10.1332/030557321X16861511996074.
3. L. Wirthová, "Environmentally driven migration in EU discourse: norms, policies and realities," UCL Open Environ., vol. 6, e1975, 2024, doi: 10.14324/111.444/ucloe.1975.
4. G. Fifi and X. Gao, "From the green to the just transition: the emergence of the Compensatory State in the EU's approach to climate change," JCMS: J. Common Market Stud., 2025, doi: 10.1111/jcms.13736.
5. F. Proedrou and M. Pournara, "A limited green criminological turn in the EU approach to climate change? Mapping repre-sentations of climate change as ecocide," J. Eur. Integr., pp. 1-19, 2024, doi: 10.1080/07036337.2024.2440875.
6. R. Kamphof, T. Bonenkamp, J. Selleslaghs, and M. O. Hosli, "External competences in energy and climate change," in Res. Handb. EU Energy Law Policy, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024, pp. 33-50, doi: 10.4337/9781035328024.00009.
7. F. Proedrou, "Anthropocene geopolitics and foreign policy: Exploring the link in the EU case," Alternatives, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 83-101, 2020, doi: 10.1177/0304375420931706.
8. S. Bauerle Danzman and S. Meunier, "The EU's geoeconomic turn: from policy laggard to institutional innovator," JCMS: J. Common Market Stud., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1097-1115, 2024, doi: 10.1111/jcms.13599.
9. A. Herranz-Surralles, "The EU energy transition in a geopoliticizing world," Geopolitics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1882-1912, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2023.2283489.
10. T. Melchiorre, "The international and regional dimensions of the environmental actorness of the European Union," J. Contemp. Eur. Stud., pp. 1-15, 2025, doi: 10.1080/14782804.2025.2472625.
11. N. Šekarić Stojanović and K. Zakić, "Renewable energy as a connecting spot between China and Central and Eastern European countries: status, directions and perspectives," Energy Sustain. Soc., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 10, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s13705-024-00439-2.
12. J. Dreyer, "The Power of Victimhood: A Relational Analysis of the Diplomatic Negotiations on a UN Loss and Damage Fund," Millennium, 2025, doi: 10.1177/03058298251318780.
13. T. Gamkrelidze, "Understanding EU's securitization of the neighborhood: frame alignment and projection on partner coun-tries," Eur. Polit. Soc., pp. 1-26, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23745118.2024.2421900.
14. X. Ruiz-Campillo and C. del Río, "Make room for me! A study of how climate change and environment landed on Spanish national security," Eur. Secur., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 44-62, 2024, doi: 10.1080/09662839.2023.2213164.
15. D. Jayaram and A. Vogler, "Climate Change and the Military: Discourses and Practices," in Oxford Res. Encycl. Int. Stud., 2025, doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.890.
16. T. M. Wik and A. W. Neal, "The prioritisation of climate security: A content analysis of national security agendas," Environ. Secur., 2024, doi: 10.1177/27538796241257554.
17. S. K. Panda, "Challenges and opportunities for European energy policy and sustainable transformations in the aftermath of Russia’s military intervention in Ukraine," Environ. Dev. Sustain., pp. 1-22, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-04863-4.
18. G. A. Deirmentzoglou, E. E. Anastasopoulou, and P. Sklias, "International economic relations and energy security in the Eu-ropean Union: a systematic literature review," Int. J. Sustain. Energy, vol. 43, no. 1, p. 2385682, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14786451.2024.2385682.
19. M. McDonald, "Climate change, security and the institutional prospects for ecological security," Geoforum, vol. 155, p. 104096, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104096.
20. J. Pollak and S. R. Schubert, "Squaring the Circle? The EU’s Energy Dilemma," in The European Union’s Geopolitics: The Lackluster World Power, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 119-139. ISBN: 9783031745867.
21. Z. Ahmad, "Worlds Apart: The Fairness Dimension of Securitisation Narratives in the Climate Change and Foreign Investment Context," 2025, doi: 10.1007/8165_2024_131.
22. E. Post and P. Le Billon, "The ‘green war’: Geopolitical metabolism and green extractivisms," Geopolitics, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 760-800, 2025, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2024.2385411.
23. T. Meyer, "Mapping energy geopolitics in Europe: journalistic cartography and energy securitisation After the Russian invasion of Ukraine," Geopolitics, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 432-464, 2025, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2024.2362668.
24. F. von Malmborg, "Tapping the conversation on the meaning of decarbonization: Discourses and discursive agency in EU politics on low-carbon fuels for maritime shipping," Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 13, p. 5589, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16135589.
25. S. Kalantzakos, "China as partner? Tackling climate and energy challenges," in The Transatlantic Community and China in the Age of Disruption, Routledge, 2024, pp. 178-194. ISBN: 9781003273936.
26. Z. Dubský, M. Votoupalová, and A. Vítková, "Framing the European Green Deal: political and media energy discourses in Czechia and Sweden," Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-04557-w.
27. M. McDonald, "Accepting responsibility? Institutions and the security implications of climate change," Secur. Dialogue, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 293-310, 2024, doi: 10.1177/09670106231212149.
28. H. G. Brauch, "The Anthropocene and International Political Order: Towards an Integrated Analysis," in Towards Rethinking Politics, Policy and Polity in the Anthropocene: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 89-157, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-71807-6_2.
29. M. Salman, G. Wang, L. Qin, and X. He, "G20 roadmap for carbon neutrality: The role of Paris agreement, artificial intelligence, and energy transition in changing geopolitical landscape," J. Environ. Manag., vol. 367, p. 122080, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122080.
30. S. E. Amanfo and J. J. Puthenkalam, "Perspective Chapter: The Regime Matters–A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Energy Security in the Era of Climate Change and Growing Uncertainties for Resilience in Sustainable Energy Development," in Power Quality and Harmonics Management in Modern Power Systems, IntechOpen, 2024, doi: 10.5772/intechopen.1003092.
31. T. Jerzyniak, "The EU De‐Risking of Energy Dependencies: Towards a New Clean Energy Geopolitical Order?," Politics Govern., vol. 12, 2024, doi: 10.17645/pag.8285.
32. W. He, Z. Liu, and R. Zhang, "Energy transitions in Europe since 2022: A case study of France and Germany," in Connecting Ideas, Cultures, and Communities, Routledge, 2025, pp. 412-422. ISBN: 9781003591511.
33. K. Conca and G. D. Dabelko, "The international (in) security order and the climate-conflict-security nexus," Environ. Secur., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 501-524, 2024, doi: 10.1177/27538796241287358.
34. C. Kuzemko, M. Blondeel, M. Bradshaw, G. Bridge, E. Faigen, and L. Fletcher, "Rethinking energy geopolitics: Towards a ge-opolitical economy of global energy transformation," Geopolitics, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 531-565, 2025, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2024.2351075.
35. I. Hilali, E. Dogan, Y. Altin, A. Servi, and Y. Isiker, "The geostrategic and economic impact of Türkiye’s hydrogen energy vision on Europe," Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, vol. 57, pp. 100-106, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.002.
36. A. Nazareth, D. Kim, and Z. Shawoo, "External power dynamics and international climate governance in a crises-constrained world," Clim. Dev., vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 881-891, 2024, doi: 10.1080/17565529.2024.2330984.
37. Y. Kurnyshova, "Chains of insecurities: constructing Ukraine’s agency in times of war," Policy Stud., vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 423-442, 2024, doi: 10.1080/01442872.2024.2325052.
38. M. Trbojević, D. Jovanović, and D. Đurđević, "Security policies and sustainable development in the Western Balkan region beyond 2022: current status, challenges, and prospects," Energy Sustain. Soc., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 55, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s13705-024-00486-9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Siyu Chen (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
