Research on High-precision Navigation Data Processing Under Communication Channel Optimization

Authors

  • Hongzhi Shi Dalian Zhoushuizi International Airport Co., Ltd., Dalian, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71222/sf3mbw28

Keywords:

channel optimization, civil aviation, data fusion, integrated navigation, state awareness

Abstract

High-precision navigation data are exceptionally vulnerable to channel fading, background noise, multipath interference, link delay, and packet loss within complex wireless communication applications. To address these critical challenges, the intricate coupling between communication channel optimization and robust navigation data processing is comprehensively considered in this study. Based on the fundamental principles of navigation data transmission and the mechanisms of channel degradation, a novel channel state awareness and data fusion processing framework tailored for high-precision navigation applications is systematically developed. Within this proposed framework, key performance indicators, including the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), bit error rate (BER), packet loss rate (PLR), and transmission delay, are considered as primary observations to fully evaluate the reliability of the communication link. Subsequently, the channel quality evaluation results are seamlessly integrated into navigation data preprocessing, anomaly detection, dynamic weight allocation, and error feedback correction mechanisms. To validate the proposed methodology, five distinct simulation scenarios—encompassing normal channel conditions, low SNR, multipath effects, high packet loss, and dynamic occlusion—are rigorously tested. These simulation scenarios are quantitatively compared with traditional Kalman filtering, weighted least squares, and ordinary multi-source fusion techniques. The results demonstrate that the navigation data processor, when constrained by channel optimization limits, can significantly decrease the mean positioning error in a complex environment. Furthermore, it substantially improves overall data accuracy and trajectory continuity. Ultimately, this research provides substantial engineering reference value for civil aviation navigation data links, airport surface movement guidance, airborne GNSS/INS integrated navigation, and BeiDou/GNSS-based high-precision aviation terminals.

References

1. S. Wang, X. Dong, G. Liu, M. Gao, G. Xiao, W. Zhao, and D. Lv, "GNSS RTK/UWB/DBA fusion positioning method and its performance evaluation," Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 23, p. 5928, 2022.

2. K. Wang, A. El-Mowafy, W. Qin, and X. Yang, "Integrity monitoring of PPP-RTK positioning; Part I: GNSS-based IM procedure," Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 44, 2021.

3. F. Mirmohammadian, J. Asgari, S. Verhagen, and A. Amiri-Simkooei, "Multi-GNSS-weighted interpolated tropospheric delay to improve long-baseline RTK positioning," Sensors, vol. 22, no. 15, p. 5570, 2022.

4. L. Benvenuto, T. Cosso, and G. Delzanno, "An adaptive algorithm for multipath mitigation in GNSS positioning with Android smartphones," Sensors, vol. 22, no. 15, p. 5790, 2022.

5. H. J. Kim, Y. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, S. J. Park, B. S. Ko, and J. W. Song, "Improving the accuracy of vehicle position in an urban environment using the outlier mitigation algorithm based on GNSS multi-position clustering," Remote Sensing, vol. 15, no. 15, p. 3791, 2023.

6. Y. Tao, C. Liu, T. Chen, X. Zhao, C. Liu, H. Hu, and H. Xin, "Real‐Time Multipath Mitigation in Multi‐GNSS Short Baseline Positioning via CNN‐LSTM Method," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 6573230, 2021.

7. F. Nunes and F. Sousa, "Deep learning soft-decision GNSS multipath detection and mitigation," Sensors, vol. 24, no. 14, p. 4663, 2024.

8. S. Li, X. Li, H. Wang, Y. Zhou, and Z. Shen, "Multi-GNSS PPP/INS/Vision/LiDAR tightly integrated system for precise navigation in urban environments," Information Fusion, vol. 90, pp. 218–232, 2023.

9. Y. Tao, C. Liu, R. Tong, X. Zhao, Y. Feng, and J. Wang, "Multipath mitigation in single-frequency multi-gnss tightly combined positioning via a modified multipath hemispherical map method," Remote Sensing, vol. 16, no. 24, p. 4679, 2024.

10. X. Li, X. Li, J. Huang, Z. Shen, B. Wang, Y. Yuan, and K. Zhang, "Improving PPP–RTK in urban environment by tightly coupled integration of GNSS and INS: X. Li et al.," Journal of Geodesy, vol. 95, no. 12, p. 132, 2021.

11. X. Zheng, B. Tang, and H. Pu, "Research on channel optimization of Ads‐B aviation target surveillance radar based on improved filtering algorithm," Complexity, vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 9436589, 2021.

12. Q. Zhong, Y. Yu, Y. Huang, and T. Zhang, "Prediction and optimization of civil aviation flight delays based on machine learning algorithms," International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 189, 2025.

13. N. B. Zemlyanskaya, N. V. Kazakova, and G. V. Tikhonov, "Optimization of Communication Channels and Integration of Digital Technology in the Aviation Industry," Russian Engineering Research, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1607–1609, 2025.

14. P. Zhang, "Optimization and Implementation of Intelligent Scheduling Algorithms in the Civil Aviation Supply Chain," in *2024 International Conference on Industrial IoT, Big Data and Supply Chain (IIoTBDSC)*, pp. 314–318, Sep. 2024.

15. R. Zheng, X. Li, and Y. Chen, "An overview of cognitive radio technology and its applications in civil aviation," Sensors, vol. 23, no. 13, p. 6125, 2023.

16. L. Z. Lijuan and T. Z. Tianhang, "Civil Aviation Route Network Path Optimization Strategy Based on Multi-Objective Decision Making," Journal of Technology Innovation and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 7, 2025.

Downloads

Published

18 June 2026

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Shi, H. (2026). Research on High-precision Navigation Data Processing Under Communication Channel Optimization. Journal of Computer, Signal, and System Research, 3(2), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.71222/sf3mbw28