Development Status and Prospects of Orthopedic Internal Fixation Devices in the Context of Digitalization and Personalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/wvz41031Keywords:
orthopedic internal fixation, digitalization, personalization, 3D printing, surgical planning, fracture healing, implantsAbstract
This review delves into the evolution and future trajectory of orthopedic internal fixation devices, with a specific focus on the transformative impact of digitalization and personalization. Orthopedic internal fixation, a cornerstone of fracture management and reconstructive surgery, is undergoing a paradigm shift driven by advancements in digital technologies such as 3D printing, computational modeling, and robotic surgery. Personalization, facilitated by these digital tools, aims to tailor implants and surgical procedures to the unique anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of each patient. This review begins with a historical overview of internal fixation devices, highlighting key milestones and technological innovations. It then explores the core themes of digitalization and personalization, examining how these concepts are shaping the design, manufacturing, and application of orthopedic implants. Specific areas of focus include patient-specific implants, surgical planning software, and intraoperative navigation systems. A comparative analysis of traditional and digitally-enhanced approaches to internal fixation is presented, along with a discussion of the challenges and limitations associated with the adoption of new technologies. These challenges encompass regulatory hurdles, cost considerations, and the need for specialized training. Finally, the review concludes with a forward-looking perspective on the future of orthopedic internal fixation, anticipating further integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and biocompatible materials to optimize patient outcomes and reduce the incidence of implant-related complications. This includes exploration of predictive modeling for fracture healing and remote monitoring of implant stability. The ultimate goal is to achieve precision orthopedics, where internal fixation is precisely tailored to the individual patient for optimal healing and functional restoration.References
1. X. Wu and Z. Ye, “Development and prospects of digital orthopedics in Hubei province,” Global Health J., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 94-97, 2019.
2. Y. X. Chen, K. Zhang, Y. N. Hao, and Y. C. Hu, “Research status and application prospects of digital technology in orthopaedics,” Orthopaedic Surgery, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 131-138, 2012.
3. M. Cronskär, On customization of orthopedic implants-from design and additive manufacturing to implementation. Mid Sweden University, 2014.
4. H. Shen and H. Liu, “Progress in clinical application of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery,” Digital Medicine, vol. 9, no. 2, e00002, 2023.
5. H. Gao, S. Hongxun, C. Bin, W. Zixiang, F. Yong, W. Xu, et al., “Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery,” in Digital Orthopedics, 2017, pp. 333-423.
6. Y. Wang, M. Fan, Q. Zaman, and P. Zheng, “Application progress and potential of digital medicine in pediatric orthopedics,” Digital Medicine, vol. 7, 4, 2021.
7. Y. Youssef, D. De Wet, D. A. Back, and J. Scherer, “Digitalization in orthopaedics: a narrative review,” Frontiers in Surgery, vol. 10, 1325423, 2024.
8. X. Wang and Q. Kang, “Digitized Precision Corrective Osteotomy for Treating Knee Joint Deformities: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives,” Orthopaedic Surgery, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 2221-2233, 2025.
9. A. Digdoyo, A. S. B. Karno, W. Hastomo, A. Tunjungsari, N. Kamilia, I. S. K. Wardhana, and N. Yuningsih, “REAL-TIME STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING FOR CUSTOM PRODUCT DESIGN: A CASE STUDY OF ORTHOPEDIC FIXATOR PRODUCT,” J-Icon: Jurnal Komputer dan Informatika, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 126-133, 2023.
10. J. Scherer, D. De Wet, Y. Youssef, and D. A. Back, “Digitalization in orthopedics,” in The Digital Doctor, 2025, pp. 275-290.
11. M. D. Trajanovic and O. Canciglieri Junior, “Personalized medicine in Orthopedic—State of the art,” Personalized orthopedics: Contributions and applications of biomedical engineering, pp. 3-31, 2022.
12. M. D. Eitan Segev and M. D. Michael Drexler, “Preoperative Planning of orthopedic Procedures using digitalized software systems.”
