Soil Chemistry Enhancement through Coordination Polymer Urease Inhibitors: Environmental Impact Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/qaw0tg91Keywords:
coordination polymers, urease inhibitors, soil enzymes, environmental impact, soil chemistry, sustainable agricultureAbstract
The application of coordination polymer urease inhibitors represents a promising advancement in sustainable agriculture, offering enhanced nitrogen use efficiency while minimizing environmental degradation. This comprehensive study evaluates the environmental impact of copper-based coordination polymers as urease inhibitors in soil systems, examining their effects on soil enzyme activities, microbial communities, and overall soil health. Recent developments in coordination polymer technology have demonstrated significant potential for improving agricultural productivity while reducing ammonia emissions and environmental contamination. The research integrates findings from multiple studies examining the interaction between synthetic urease inhibitors and natural soil processes, with particular emphasis on enzyme activity modulation and microbial community dynamics. Environmental impact assessments reveal that properly designed coordination polymer systems can enhance soil nutrient cycling without compromising biological diversity or soil functionality. The study demonstrates that copper-based coordination polymers exhibit superior urease inhibition efficiency compared to conventional inhibitors, with reduced environmental persistence and improved biodegradability. Furthermore, these novel materials show promise for addressing cadmium contamination while maintaining soil metabolic functions. The findings suggest that coordination polymer urease inhibitors represent a viable solution for sustainable intensification of agricultural systems, providing effective nitrogen management while preserving soil ecosystem integrity and supporting long-term agricultural sustainability.
References
1. R. G. Burns, J. L. DeForest, J. Marxsen, R. L. Sinsabaugh, M. E. Stromberger, and M. D. Wallenstein et al., "Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions," Soil Biol. Biochem., vol. 58, pp. 216–234, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009.
2. L. Wang, Z. Jia, Q. Li, L. He, J. Tian, and W. Ding et al., "Grazing Impacts on Soil Enzyme Activities Vary with Vegetation Types in the Forest-Steppe Ecotone of Northeastern China," Forests, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 2292–2292, 2023, doi: 10.3390/f14122292.
3. F. Ding, C. Y. Hung, J. K. Whalen, L. Wang, Z. Wei, L. Zhang, and Y. Shi, "Potential of chemical stabilizers to prolong urease inhibition in the soil–plant system," Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 384–390, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jpln.202100314.
4. Y. Song, X. Zhang, Z. Xiao, Y. Wang, P. Yi, M. Huang, and L. Zhang, “Coupled amorphous NiFeP/cystalline Ni3S2 nanosheets enables accelerated reaction kinetics for high current density seawater electrolysis,”Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy, vol. 352, p. 124028, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124028.
5. G. Xie et al., "Dual‐Metal Sites Drive Tandem Electrocatalytic CO2 to C2+ Products," Angewandte Chemie, vol. 136, no. 47, p. e202412568, 2024, doi: 10.1002/ange.202412568.
6. M. An, D. Chang, X. Wang, and K. Wang, "Protective effects of polymer amendment on specific metabolites in soil and cotton leaves under cadmium contamination," Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., vol. 264, pp. 115463–115463, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115463.
7. Y. Cui, D. Wang, C. Zhou, X. Zhang, H. Ben, and X. Yang, "Interfacially Synergistic Pd-Supported Al-SiO2 Catalysts for Selective Hydrogenolysis of Cellulose to Ethanol," Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Energy, vol. 325, p. 125818, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125818.
8. A. B. da Fonseca, C. Santos, A. P. P. Nunes, D. P. Oliveira, M. E. A. de Melo, and T. Takayama et al., "Urease inhibitors technologies as strategy to mitigate agricultural ammonia emissions and enhance the use efficiency of urea-based fertilizers," Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 22739, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50061-z.
9. V. Pereira, P. C. Castilho, and J. A. M. Pereira, "Analysis of the Environmental Impact of Botanical Pesticides in Soil," Agriculture, vol. 15, no. 10, p. 1053, 2025, doi: 10.3390/agriculture15101053.
10. Q. Wu, J. Zhang, X. Liu, T. Chang, Q. Wang, and H. Shaghaleh et al., "Effects of biochar and vermicompost on microorganisms and enzymatic activities in greenhouse soil," Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 10, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.1060277.
11. F. Ding, C. Ma, W.-L. Duan, and J. Luan, "Second auxiliary ligand induced two coppor-based coordination polymers and urease inhibition activity," J. Solid State Chem., vol. 331, pp. 124537–124537, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2023.124537.
12. B. Shi, J. Zhang, C. Wang, J. Ma, and W. Sun, "Responses of hydrolytic enzyme activities in saline-alkaline soil to mixed inorganic and organic nitrogen addition," Sci. Rep., vol. 8, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22813-9.
13. F. Ding, N. Su, C. Ma, B. Li, W.-L. Duan, and J. Luan, "Fabrication of two novel two-dimensional copper-based coordination polymers regulated by the 'V'-shaped second auxiliary ligands as high-efficiency urease inhibitors," Inorg. Chem. Commun., vol. 170, p. 113319, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2024.113319.
14. S. Jezierska-Tys, S. Wesołowska, A. Gałązka, J. Joniec, J. Bednarz, and R. Cierpiała, "Biological activity and functional diversity in soil in different cultivation systems," Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 4189–4204, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-02762-5.
15. J. M. Gonzalez, M. M. Santana, E. J. Gomez, and J. A. Delgado, "Soil Thermophiles and Their Extracellular Enzymes: A Set of Capabilities Able to Provide Significant Services and Risks," Microorganisms, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1650–1650, 2023, doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11071650.
16. M. S. Ayilara and O. O. Babalola, "Bioremediation of environmental wastes: the role of microorganisms," Front. Agron., vol. 5, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fagro.2023.1183691.
17. S. Bala, D. Garg, B. V. Thirumalesh, M. Sharma, K. Sridhar, and B. S. Inbaraj et al., "Recent Strategies for Bioremediation of Emerging Pollutants: A Review for a Green and Sustainable Environment," Toxics, vol. 10, no. 8, p. 484, 2022, doi: 10.3390/toxics10080484.
18. W. Zaman, A. Ayaz, and D. Puppe, "Biogeochemical Cycles in Plant–Soil Systems: Significance for Agriculture, Interconnections, and Anthropogenic Disruptions," Biology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 433–433, 2025, doi: 10.3390/biology14040433.
19. Y. Li, C. Wang, J. Wu, Zhang Y, Q. Li, and S. Liu et al., "The Effects of Localized Plant–Soil–Microbe Interactions on Soil Nitrogen Cycle in Maize Rhizosphere Soil under Long-Term Fertilizers," Agronomy, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2114–2114, 2023, doi: 10.3390/agronomy13082114.
20. Y. Ding, X. Gao, D. Shu, Kadambot H.M. Siddique, X. Song, and P. Wu et al., "Enhancing soil health and nutrient cycling through soil amendments: Improving the synergy of bacteria and fungi," Sci. Total Environ., vol. 923, pp. 171332–171332, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171332.
21. Q. Zhang, J. Li, S. Zhang, Y. Li, N. Wu, and X. Zhou et al., "Differentiate responses of soil nutrient levels and enzymatic activities to freeze-thawing cycles in different layers of moss-dominated biocrusts in a temperate desert," Front. Plant Sci., vol. 14, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1137754.
