Post-pandemic Architectural Design: A Review of Global Adaptations in Public Buildings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/1cj1j328Keywords:
post-pandemic architecture, public buildings, design adaptations, health and safety, smart technologiesAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically reshaped the way public buildings are designed and used, forcing architects and urban planners to rethink existing architectural norms. This review explores the global adaptations in public building design in response to the pandemic, focusing on key changes in spatial organization, health and safety protocols, and the integration of smart technologies. Drawing from case studies across North America, Europe, and Asia, the paper highlights the importance of flexibility, modularity, and sustainability in post-pandemic architectural solutions. It also examines the emerging role of advanced technologies such as AI, automation, and data-driven design in enhancing the user experience and ensuring safety. The review concludes with a discussion on the long-term implications for future architectural practice and identifies gaps in current research, suggesting areas for further exploration in the evolving field of post-pandemic architecture.
References
1. S. De Yong, M. Rachmawati, and I. Defiana, “Theorizing security-pandemic aspects and variables for post-pandemic archi-tecture,” Build. Environ., vol. 258, p. 111579, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111579.
2. S. Papu and S. Pal, “Braced for impact: Architectural praxis in a post-pandemic society,” Authorea Prepr., 2024, doi: 10.31124/advance.12196959.v1.
3. A. Bahador and M. Mahmudi Zarandi, “Biophilic design: an effective design approach during pandemic and post-pandemic,” Facil., vol. 42, no. 1/2, pp. 68–82, 2024, doi: 10.1108/F-01-2023-0004.
4. S. De Yong, M. Rachmawati, and I. Defiana, “Designing secure hybrid living-working interior spaces in post-pandemic period: a review,” Int. J. Workplace Health Manag., ahead-of-print, 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJWHM-12-2023-0181.
5. X. Liu, H. Moayedi, A. A. Dehrashid, W. Dai, and Q. T. Thi, “Developments and evolution of housing architecture in the post-Corona era with a health-oriented approach,” Build. Environ., vol. 265, p. 111936, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111936.
6. O. Omar and S. El Sayary, “The resilience principles of the built environment in light of climate change and the post-pandemic era,” in Resilience vs Pandemics: Innovations in Public Places and Buildings, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024, pp. 137–152, doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-8672-9_9.
7. M. Zivkovic, M. Stanimirovic, M. Stamenkovic, S. Kondic, and V. Petrovic, “Learning from the past, looking to resilience: Housing in Serbia in the post-pandemic era,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 1461, 2024, doi: 10.3390/buildings14051461.
8. O. E. Bellini, M. Romagnoli, and M. Arcieri, “What has COVID-19 taught us? Student housing in a post-pandemic era,” in Int. Symp. New Metrop. Perspect., Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2024, pp. 97–109, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-74716-8_10.
9. Y. Kong, C. Teng, and C. Liu, “Transition design as a strategy for post-pandemic spatial experience enhancement: A sus-tainability perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 14, p. 5834, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16145834.
