Key Technologies and Practical Verification of Carbon Emission Reduction in the Whole Chain of Green Operation of Power Transmission and Transformation Projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/zhvwf989Keywords:
power transmission and transformation, green operation, carbon emission reduction, digital twin, blockchain, intelligent optimization, life cycle assessmentAbstract
This paper presents key technologies for carbon emission reduction across the entire chain of green operation in power transmission and transformation projects. Based on the actual conditions of the Zhejiang power grid, an integrated carbon reduction control system is established, incorporating intelligent perception, data processing, and decision optimization layers. By leveraging IoT, digital twin, blockchain, and advanced optimization algorithms, the system enables dynamic monitoring, modeling, early warning, and collaborative optimization of carbon emissions. Practical applications in typical projects demonstrate significant reductions in operational carbon emissions and substantial economic and social benefits. Looking forward, the deeper integration of artificial intelligence and big data technologies will further enhance the intelligence and automation of carbon reduction strategies, supporting the achievement of China's dual carbon goals.
References
1. Z. Wang, et al., “Carbon emissions of power transmission and transformation projects in the whole life cycle for smart sus-tainable energy systems,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 3812, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54317-0.
2. X. Chen and Y. Ou, “Carbon emission accounting for power transmission and transformation equipment: An extended life cycle approach,” Energy Rep., vol. 10, pp. 1369–1378, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.08.010.
3. S. Liu, et al., “Modelling and discussion on emission reduction transformation path of China's electric power industry under “double carbon” goal,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 9, 2022, Art. no. e10497, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10497.
4. H. Wang, et al., “Transregional electricity transmission and carbon emissions: evidence from ultra-high voltage transmission projects in China,” Energy Econ., vol. 123, p. 106751, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106751.
5. G. Zhao, et al., “Energy system transformations and carbon emission mitigation for China to achieve global 2 C climate target,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 292, p. 112721, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112721.
6. T. Bai, et al., “Digital economy, industrial transformation and upgrading, and spatial transfer of carbon emissions: The paths for low-carbon transformation of Chinese cities,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 344, p. 118528, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118528.
7. H. Feng, et al., “Digital transformation on enterprise green innovation: Effect and transmission mechanism,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 19, no. 17, p. 10614, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710614.
8. G. Yang, et al., “Digital transformation and low-carbon technology innovation in manufacturing firms: The mediating role of dynamic capabilities,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 263, p. 108969, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108969.
9. H. Wang, et al., “How does digital technology promote carbon emission reduction? Empirical evidence based on e-commerce pilot city policy in China,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 325, p. 116524, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116524.
10. J. Wang, et al., “How does digital transformation drive green total factor productivity? Evidence from Chinese listed enter-prises,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 406, p. 136954, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136954.
11. J. Ojadi, et al., “Big data analytics and AI for optimizing supply chain sustainability and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in logistics and transportation,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Growth Eval., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1536–1548, 2024, doi: 10.54660/.IJMRGE.2024.5.1.1536-1548.
12. K. Du, Y. Cheng, and X. Yao, “Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial structure upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities,” Energy Econ., vol. 98, p. 105247, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105247.
