Open-Source Modular Innovation and Gen Z Productivity: Understanding Hard-Tech Democratization in Shenzhen's Maker Economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71222/775prx52Keywords:
open-source innovation, generation z, productivity, digital literacy, maker economyAbstract
This study examines the relationship between open-source modular innovation and Generation Z (Gen Z) productivity, with particular attention to the roles of demographic variables and key mediating factors. Using survey data from 350 respondents within Shenzhen's maker ecosystem, the findings indicate that open-source modular innovation positively influences Gen Z productivity, particularly in creativity and problem-solving. Age and education level significantly affect engagement and productivity, while sex shows no significant effect. Correlation and structural analyses further suggest that accessibility, collaboration, and modularity are important drivers of productivity outcomes. The study provides empirical support for open-source innovation theory and highlights the importance of digital literacy, motivation, and engagement in translating technological access into productive performance. Practically, the findings suggest that organizations and educators should develop more collaborative, accessible, and customizable innovation platforms to enhance Gen Z productivity. These results contribute to understanding how democratized technology ecosystems can foster innovation capabilities among younger generations in emerging tech hubs.References
1. Z. Li, W. Seering, M. Yang, and C. Eesley, "Understanding the motivations for open-source hardware entrepreneurship," Design Science, vol. 7, p. e19, 2021.
2. S. Johanning, F. Scheller, D. Abitz, C. Wehner, and T. Bruckner, "A modular multi-agent framework for innovation diffusion in changing business environments: conceptualization, formalization and implementation," Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 8, 2020.
3. M. R. Salem, "Designing future-ready workplaces: how Gen Z’s preferred work type influence retention intention; mediating role of perceived autonomy in Malaysian SMEs," Future Business Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 211, 2025.
4. F. M. Monetti and A. Maffei, "Towards the definition of assembly-oriented modular product architectures: a systematic review," Research in Engineering Design, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 137–169, 2024.
5. V. K. Ahuja, N. Kazantsev, and R. Plattfaut, "Open innovation via open source: Collaboration of companies to infuse automobiles with digital technologies," unpublished.
6. C. K. Y. Chan and K. K. Lee, "The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers?," Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 60, 2023.
7. M. B. Lima and F. I. Kubota, "A modular product design framework for the home appliance industry," The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 2311–2330, 2022.
8. J. D. Kahn, V. Pratap, T. Likhomanenko, Q. Xu, A. Hannun, J. Cai, ... and R. Collobert, "Flashlight: Enabling innovation in tools for machine learning," in International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, June 2022, pp. 10557–10574.
9. X. Chen, J. Mao, Y. Ma, and G. Li, "The knowledge linkage between science and technology influences corporate technological innovation: Evidence from scientific publications and patents," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 198, p. 122985, 2024.
10. B. Kieslinger, T. Schaefer, C. M. Fabian, E. Biasin, E. Bassi, R. R. Freire, ... and P. Melis, "Covid-19 response from global makers: the Careables cases of global design and local production," Frontiers in Sociology, vol. 6, p. 629587, 2021.
11. E. Thun, D. Taglioni, T. Sturgeon, and M. P. Dallas, "Massive modularity: Understanding industry organization in the digital age," Development Research, 2022.
12. D. F. Parracho, M. Nour El-Din, I. Esmaeili, S. S. Freitas, L. Rodrigues, J. Poças Martins, ... and A. S. Guimarães, "Modular construction in the digital age: A systematic review on smart and sustainable innovations," Buildings, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 765, 2025.
13. X. Chen and Y. Zhou, "Open-Source Collaboration and Technological Innovation in the Industrial Software Industry: A Multi-Case Study," Systems, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 433, 2025.
14. S. Chen and J. Lin, “Making with Shenzhen (Characteristics)—Strategy and everyday tactics in a city’s creative turn,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 9, Art. no. 4923, 2021.
15. D. Ryu, K. H. Baek, and J. Yoon, “Open innovation with relational capital, technological innovation capital, and international performance in SMEs,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 6, Art. no. 3418, 2021.
16. Y. Wu and Z. Ma, “The power of makerspaces: Heterotopia and innovation,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 1, Art. no. 629, 2022.
